American public opinion is important when considering
climate change action and viable energy alternatives.
Public understanding of the phenomenon and its
implications are important considerations as voters choose
policy makers and policy makers choose courses of action to
enact preventative measures and deal with the ramifications
of climate change.
Public attitude surveys yield three major findings. The first is that Americans see climate change as a problem. The second is that the American public wants to see political action on climate change. The third is that Americans are willing to pay to do something about climate change.
According to a poll conducted by NBC News and the Wall
Street Journal in 2006, 66% of Americans believed climate
change was occurring and required action. This was up 12%
from when the question was asked in 1999. In addition,
35% were concerned enough to state that immediate
action is needed. In 1999, only 24% of respondents said
the same.1 Similar polling as recent as April 2009, suggests
that the trend has not reversed despite the downturn in the
economy.2 55% of Americans according to an American
Security Project poll believe climate change is a threat to
national security.3 Data suggests that growing numbers of Americans believe climate change is a real issue and fewer
Americans believe that we should wait for additional information
before taking action.
A large majority of Americans also feel the government
should do more to deal with climate change. Nearly three
fourths of those polled, 72%, think the government should
do more now to deal with the effects of climate change. Only
7% of those feel the government should be doing less. In our
poll conducted in August of 2009, 60% of Americans strongly
supported the government taking action to reduce carbon
pollution. In an earlier poll conducted in July of 2009, 58%
of Americans believe that climate change should be a higher
government priority than it is today.4 The American public
clearly wants action to meet the climate change challenge.
Some Americans worry about the risk to America's economic competitiveness if the United States takes action alone to reduce carbon emissions while India and China do not. However, 60% of Americans believe the United States should take action even if China and India don't implement similar measures.5
While Americans seem ready to do something about climate change, economic factors matter. According to Rasmussen Reports, 21% of Americans are willing to pay $100 more per year for cleaner energy, but only 14% are willing to pay more.6 In a similar poll, 56% of people were willing to support a cap and trade program that significantly lowered greenhouse gases, but raised monthly electrical bills by $10. Of note, respondents supporting a cap and trade program dropped to 44% when the cost was raised to $25 per month.7 The percentage of those supporting cap and trade programs, also slightly decreased from 2007 to 2008, suggesting that the price people are willing to pay is elastic and sensitive to economic downturns.
American Security Project Executive Director Dr. James Ludes responds to criticism of the intelligence community's parternship with climate scientists - "facts show this to be a low-cost, wise use of American intelligence assets."
Computer models predict a much drier Texas on par with or even exceeding 10- to 30-year "megadroughts" of past centuries, and these changes carry potentially enormous implications for agriculture, wildlife, water, infrastructure, public health, businesses and energy use.
On XM Radio's Left Jab, ASP Board Member Lieutenant General Claudia Kennedy, US Army (Ret.), discusses her work with the American Security Project and how important it is to inform the public and public opinion leaders about the national security implications of climate change.