Transportation and electricity generation are the two
greatest practical challenges to America's desire to
address climate change. The challenges these sectors
pose are quite different and difficult to resolve.
The generation of electricity in the United States is heavily
reliant on coal. Roughly 50% of all electricity consumed in
the United States comes from coal-fired power plants. With
the introduction of better emissions controls, coal plants have
managed to significantly reduce the level of pollutants they
emit, but nevertheless continue to produce CO2 at alarming
rates. Technology to capture and sequester carbon emission
remains in its infancy. No coal-fired power plant captures
any significant amount of its carbon emissions at present.9
There are also tremendous logistical problems with sequestering
massive amounts of carbon even if it were captured.
Reducing the number of coal-fired plants is a necessary
step to address CO2 emissions, but doing so would require
a significant investment in an alternative infrastructure to
produce and efficiently distribute electricity.
In comparison, the transportation sector has the fastest
energy demand growth rate and it is also most reliant on
the most problematic energy source -- imported petroleum.
The United States lags behind many industrialized nations in mass transportation and inter-city connectors like highspeed rail. Going from London to Paris by rail -- a distance of slightly more than 200 miles -- takes two-and-a-quarter hours.10 Amtrak from New York to Boston -- roughly the same distance -- takes three-and-a-half hours, literally 50% longer.11 Because the United States is so large and spread-out, compared to many other industrialized nations, we face unique challenges in the transportation sector.

Nonetheless, total vehicle fuel efficiency
has barely improved in over
20 years, even as the number of
vehicles on the road has continued
to increase dramatically.12 New fuel
economy standards announced
by the Obama administration in
May of 2009 will hopefully lead
to improvements. Progress on this
front would significantly reduce both
America's carbon emissions and reliance
on foreign oil.
In the past 20 years, energy consumption
per real dollar of GDP has declined by approximately
50%.13 Interestingly, cost savings measures
and greater efficiency in American industry have resulted
comparatively in less energy consumption growth than in
other major sectors of the U.S. economy. This demonstrates
that economic incentives can drive significant improvements
in energy efficiency.
American Security Project Executive Director Dr. James Ludes responds to criticism of the intelligence community's parternship with climate scientists - "facts show this to be a low-cost, wise use of American intelligence assets."
Computer models predict a much drier Texas on par with or even exceeding 10- to 30-year "megadroughts" of past centuries, and these changes carry potentially enormous implications for agriculture, wildlife, water, infrastructure, public health, businesses and energy use.
On XM Radio's Left Jab, ASP Board Member Lieutenant General Claudia Kennedy, US Army (Ret.), discusses her work with the American Security Project and how important it is to inform the public and public opinion leaders about the national security implications of climate change.